De game-jaren

Retro is in zeggen ze … wel ik denk dat ik op het vlak van games gewoon in het verleden ben blijven steken. Ergens rond de eerste jaren dat ik een pc had, 1997 moet dat ongeveer zijn. Deze week kocht ik nog een game van dat gezegende jaar Command & Conquer: Red Alert. Jaja, de eerste, in 1997 had ik hem ook al, maar slechts de gekopieerde versie en die is dan es verloren geraakt. Toen ik hem deze week aan 2 euro in de Mediamarkt zag liggen brak mijn hart en nam ik heb mee en speel nu (toegegeven deels uit sentiment) iedere avond een nieuw level. Ik heb eigenlijk nooit de aanleg gehad om een gamer te zijn. In mijn eerste lic zat ik vaak soms uren met mijn maat achter zijne PC terwijl hij Diablo 2 speelde. Dat was best wel boeiend en ik gaf hem steeds tactische bijsturingen en opmerkingen, maar zelf spelen no way.

Het meeste van pc’s heb ik geleerd door te kijken. We gaan bijna 20 jaar terug in de tijd toen ik als 6-jarige vol verwondering stond te kijken naar die Commodore van mijn nonkel waar mijn neven Pacman, Ski or Die of Winter Games op speelden. Aaaah de tijd van de ‘echte’ 5,25″ floppy’s … Het moet 1994 geweest zijn toen ze hun Pentium kochten en we een stap verder zetten in de gamer-geschiedenis. Het eerste spel dat erop stond was Wolfenstein 3D, nog steeds één van mijn favorieten … fuck grafics, dit is gewoon een schitterend spel nah. Daarop volgde het iets mindere Blake Stone en nog van 3D Realms/Apogee verscheen ook Raptor. Dan kwam Prince of Persia, dat vond ik al iets moeilijker :p niets voor mij dus. En toen ging mijn wereld open: eerst met Dune 2 en dan met de eerste Command & Concquer (GDI en Brotherhood of NOD). Real time strategy bleek mijn ding te zijn en ik was dagen niet weg te slaan van mijn nonkel zijn pc, sommige dagen was ik er meer mee bezig dan mijn neven zelf. Dat waren ook de dagen wanneer ik mij amuseerde met het eerste en enige voetbalspel dat niet te moeilijk en te realistisch was voor mij: Fifa 94, het spel van de oneindige ommehaals en het 20 maal scoren door voor de keeper te staan. En toen brak de zon door de wolken en kocht ons vader een eigen pc. De eerste spellen die ik erop speelde waren Fury3x en het eindeloos boeiender Terminal Velocity. Het waren de jaren van schitterende games: 1996: Duke Nukem 3D (voor mij en een deel van mijn vrienden nog steeds een tijdloze first person shooter), Transport Tycoon, Civilization II (AoE kon hier gewoon nooit aan tippen) * 1997: C&C: Red Alert, Need for Speed 2 en Carmageddon * om in 1998 af te sluiten met Dune 2000 en nog een laatste stuiptrekking een beetje later met Starcraft. En ze mogen nu nog komen zeveren over hun Halo’s en Medal of Honor’s, mij kan het allemaal niet schelen … ik ben blijven steken in het midden van de jaren ’90, toen de games nog echte arcade waren en niet zo realistisch mogelijk wilden zijn. De games in de post vermeld zijn de enige die ik langer dan een uur heb gespeeld en die ik nog altijd hier en daar eens durf bovenhalen … noem het oudbolligheid, ik noem het nostalgie.

46.630 Reacties

  1. A small thing but the line spacing and font choices made reading this physically pleasant, and a look at digestivedock maintained the same careful design, technical choices about typography are part of what makes online reading actually comfortable and this site has clearly invested in the design layer alongside the content layer carefully.

  2. ??????? ??????????????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????????. ???? ????? ???????? ?? ????, ???????? ????????????, ?????????? ??????? ????????????? ???????? ? ??????, ????????? ?? ??????? ??? ??????????. ??? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ? ???????, ??? ???????? ?????????????? ??????????? ??????. ??? ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????: ??????????? ??????? ?????????????, ???????????? ?????, ??????????? ???????, ???????? ???????????, ?????????? ????????, ????????? ? ???? ????????. ?????? ???????? ???????? ? ???????????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ?????? ????? ?? ?????

  3. A genuine compliment to the writer for keeping the post focused on what mattered, and a look at coralaisle continued that disciplined focus, focus is a editorial choice that compounds across many small decisions and this site has clearly made those small decisions consistently across what I have read so far this week here.

  4. Worth pointing out that the writing reads as confident without being defensive about it, and a look at europeelevate extended that secure tone, content that does not pre emptively argue against imagined critics has a different quality from defensive writing and this site reads as written from a place of real ease.

  5. ??????????? ??????? ???????????? ? ?????? ??????????? ?????????, ?? ?????????? ?? ???? ?? ???????? ????????????? ??????????, ??????? ????? ???????? ??? ??????????? ??????. ???? ??????? ???????? ????? ?? ????, ????????? ????? ?????????, ???????? ???????, ???????? ???????????? ????????, ??????? ?????? ? ??? ????????????? ??????????? ?????? ?????, ????, ???, ??? ??? ?????? ????????????. ????? ?????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?????????? ? ????? ????????? ??????, ????? ? ???????? ???????? ?????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – https://nadomu4.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-v-moskve14-1.ru/

  6. ? ??????? ???? ??????????? ????????? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ???????, ?????? ?????? ????????????????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????????, ??????? ??????????, ????????????? ??????? ? ??????? ????????? ?? ?????????. ?? ????? ??????????????? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????? ??? ???????? ???????????? ????? ?????????: ???????????? ????? ?? ????? ???????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????, ? ?? ????????????? ????????????? ?????????? ??? ????? ????????????????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://vyvod-iz-zapoya-domodedovo3.ru/

  7. ??????????????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ????????????? ??????????? ??????????? ???????? ???? ??????. ???????? ????????? ???????, ???? ????????, ??????????? ???????????, ?????????? ???? ??????? ? ????????? ???????. ??????? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – ???????? ?? ??? ????? ? ????????

  8. ? ???? ?????????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ???????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????? ????????????, ???????? ? ?????????????, ??????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???????. ?? ???????? ?? ??, ????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????, ??????? ????? ?????? ? ?????? ? ????????.
    ?????? ??????????? — ??? ????? – ????? ???? ????? ????????

  9. ???????? ?? ??? ? ???????? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ??? ??????????????? ??????? ? ???????. ????? ?????? ???????????, ????? ??????? ????????? ? ?????, ?????????? ??????? ????????, ???????? ????? ??? ?????????? ????????????. ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ????????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ???????? ? ????????, ???????????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????, ????? ???? ?????????? ?????????? ????? ???????. ??? ???????? ????????? ???????????, ??? ????? ????????? ??????? ? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????????? ????????.
    ?????? ?????? – ???? ???????? ?? ??? ? ????????

  10. Considered against the flood of similar content this one stands apart in important ways, and a stop at briskharbor extended that distinctive feel, sites that find their own corner of a crowded topic and stay there are sites worth following and this one has clearly carved out its own space and committed to defending it carefully.

  11. ???????? ?????? ?????????????? ???????? ???????? ? ?????????????????? ??????????. ??????????? ??????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ????????????. ???????? ????????? ????????? ????? ? ????????? ??????? ?????? ????? ???????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ???????? ?? ??? ? ????????

  12. ??????? ????? ???????? ?????, ???? ????????? ???????? ?????? ??????????. ???????? ?????????, ????? ?? ????????? ????????? ??????? ???? ??? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ??????. ??? ??????? ??????????, ??????? ??? ????????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ??????? ????? ???? ????.
    ????????? – ???????? ?? ??? ? ????????

  13. ??? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ??????????. ?? ???????, ??? ??????????????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????????. ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???????????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ? ???????.
    ??????? ?????? ????? ????????? – ????????? ?? ?????

  14. ??????? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ????????, ?????? ? ??????????? ????????????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ???????????? ? ????????? ????????? ??????????. «?????????? ??????» ?????????? ????? ?????????????, ??????? ????????. ????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????, ???????????? ?????, ???????, ???????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ????-???????? ????????? ? ???????? ? ???????? ????????????. ??????????????? ?????? ??????????? ????????, ? ???????? ?? ????????? ????????? ? ??????????? ??????????????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ??????????????? ????? ?? ?????

  15. ? ???? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ???????????, ??????? ?????????? ? ??????????????? ??????. ?? ??????? ?????????, ????????? ? ?????????, ??????? ??????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ???????? ??????, ??? ?????????? ????????? ? ????????? ? ????? ????? ??? ???????????.
    ??????? ???????????? – ????????? ?? ???????? ??????

  16. A piece that did not lecture even when it had clear positions, and a look at eastcrate maintained the same teaching without preaching tone, finding the line between informing and lecturing is hard and most sites land on the wrong side of it but this one has clearly figured out how to inform without becoming preachy.

  17. ?? ?????????? ?????????? ???????? ????????, ??????? ??????? ???????????? ?????, ????? ??????????? ???????? ? ????????? ???, ???? ?? ??????? ??????? ?????? ? ????? ????????? ??? ??????????????. ?????? ????? ???? ?????, ????? ???????????? ????? ???????? ?????? ??????????. ??????????? ????????? ????? ????????????????, ??????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????????????? ???????? ??????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ????????????? ????????????

  18. ?? ????? ?????? ?????????? ???????????? ????????????? ??????????. ???? ??????????, ??? ?? ???? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????????, ???????? ?????????? ?????????. ????? ??????? ???????? ????? ??? ??????????????? ?????, ???????????? ??????, ?????????? ??????????? ?????????? ??? ????????? ? ????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – ????????? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????????

  19. ????? ????????? ?? ??? ?????????, ????? ???????????? ?????????? ?? ???? ???????? ??? ??????????, ? ?????????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ?? ??????????. ???????? ????? ?? ??????????? ????????? ??? ?????????? ?????, ?????????? ?????, ??????????? ????????, ??????? ???????, ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????. ???????? ????????? ????? ? ??????, ????????? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???????? ????? ???????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – ???? ???????? ?? ??? ? ????????

  20. ??? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ?? ???????? ???????????? ????????????. ?? ???????, ??? ??????????????? ? ??????????? ????? ?????? ? ?????????????? ????????????? ???????????. ???????? ?????? ???????????? ? ????????? ???????? ? ?????????, ??????? ???????????? ????????? ?????? ?????.
    ?????? ????? > – ????? ??? ??????????? ?? ??????????? ????????

  21. The structure of the post made it easy to follow without losing track of where I was, and a look at jarvico kept the same logical flow going, this site clearly understands that organisation is half the battle in keeping readers engaged from the first line to the last across any kind of post.

  22. ???? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?????, ???????????????? ?? ???????? ????????, ?????????? ???????? ?????????. ?? ????????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????? ???????????? ? ?????? ????????, ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ? ???????????? ???????????. ???????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????? ??????????.
    ? ??? ??????? – ?????????? ?? ???????? ????????

  23. Worth every minute of the time spent reading, and a stop at ivorybazaar extends that value across more pages, in a media environment where most content is engineered to waste attention this site stands out by treating reader time as something valuable rather than something to be exploited and stretched as far as possible.

  24. ????? ?? ????? ? ???????? ?????????, ????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????? ? ???????? ????? ?????? ?????????. ??????? ????? ?????? ????: ???????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ??????????? ????????, ???????? ????????????????? ????? ? ????????? ?????????? ?????. ???? ????????? ????????? ???????? ????, ??????????? ??????? ?? ?????. ??? ?????????? ????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ? ???????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – ???? ????? ?? ????? ? ????????

  25. Now appreciating that the post left me with enough to say in a follow up conversation, and a look at urbanparcel added more material for those follow ups, content that prepares me for related conversations rather than just informing me alone is content with social utility and this site provides that social armament reliably for me.

  26. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at jeweldepotcorner continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  27. ????????????? «??????? ??????????» ?? ??????????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ??????? ????????? ? ?????????????; ????? ?? ?????? «???», ?? ? «?????», ???????? ? ???????. ??????? ???? — ???????? ??? ????????? ??????. ???????? ????? ?????????? ?????????????.
    ?????? ?????? – ??????? ????? ?? ????? ???????

  28. ???? ??????????? ????? ???????????? ?? ????????? ???????????, ??????? ????????? ??????? ?? ????????? ? ??????????? ????????. ?? ????????? ????????????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????????, ?????????? ???????? ?? ?? ?????????? ??? ????????????? ????????. ???????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ????????? ??????????.
    ??? ??????? ??????????? – ??????? ?????????????? ? ???????

  29. ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? — ??? ??????????? ??????????? ??????????????????, ? ?? «??????? ?????????? ?? ?????». ? ??????????????? ??????? «???????????????????» ?? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????: ????????????, ?????????????????? ? ????????????? ?????????. ???????? ??????? ????????? ?????????????, ???????? ? ??????????? ?????? ? ??? ??????????????? ??????, ????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ???????. ?????? ????????????? ????? ????????? ????, ???? ???????? ? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ? ?????????? ????. ????????? ????? ???? ??????? ???????? ??????, ? ???????? — ???????? ??? ???????? ? ???????.
    ??????????? ????? – ??????????????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ? ????????????

  30. ? ???? ?????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ???????? ??????? ?????, ??????? ?????????? ? ???? ?????????. ?? ??????? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????? ??????? ? ??????????????, ? ????? ?????????, ??????? ????? ?????? ? ???????? ?????????????. ????????? ?????????????? ????? ? ????? ?????.
    ???? ???????????? — ??? – ??????????? ????? ??????

  31. ?????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ? ???????? ? ?? ??????? ?? ????? ?????. ?? ?????????? ????? ??????????, ?????? ??????? ? ???????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ?????????? ? ????????.
    ????? ???? — ??????? ????? ??????????? – ??????????????? ???????

  32. Generally I find the content on similar topics frustrating in specific ways and this post avoided all of them, and a look at movievault continued that frustration free experience, content that sidesteps the standard failure modes of its genre is content with editorial awareness and this site has clearly studied what fails elsewhere consistently.

  33. Recommended to anyone working in or curious about this area, the depth and clarity combine well, and a look at bronzecrate keeps that going across more pages, the kind of site that earns regular visits rather than chasing trends has my respect because it suggests genuine commitment to the topic itself rather than to chasing trends.

  34. ?? ???????? ????????. ?????? ??????? ? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????????: ????????? ??????? ????????????, ????????????? ???????????, ???????????????? ? ????? ? ????, ????? ????, ??????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ????????, ? ?????, ??? ????????? ?? ???????? ??????????? ????????. ??????? ???? ?????? ????? — ??????????????? ????????? ??????????, ??????? ????????????? ????? ? ?????? ?????? ????, ????????? ?????????????? ?????? ? ???????? ? ?????????? ????????????? ??? ??? «???????????». ??? ????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ??????? ?? ????? — ??? ???????? ?????? ? ???????? ???????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ?????????? – ??????????????? ??????? ??????????????? ????? ???????????

  35. ? ???? ?????? ??????????????? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????????? ?? ???????????. ???????? ??????, ??? ????????? ???????????, ???????????????? ? ????????? ?????????????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????????????.
    ??????????? ?????? — ????? ?????? – ????? ????????? ?? ??? ?????????????

  36. ???? ?? ????????? ?????? ?????? «??????? ?????» (?????????? ??????, ??????????? ????????, ?????? ?????), ?? ?????????? ???????????? ???? ???????????. ??? ?????? ????? ???????? ???? ??? ??????????? ? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ?????????????? ?? 15–20 ?????, ????? ?????? «??????? ???» ??? ?????? ??????? ? ??????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – ????? ?? ????? ????????

Laat een reactie achter

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Deze site gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie gegevens worden verwerkt.