De game-jaren

Retro is in zeggen ze … wel ik denk dat ik op het vlak van games gewoon in het verleden ben blijven steken. Ergens rond de eerste jaren dat ik een pc had, 1997 moet dat ongeveer zijn. Deze week kocht ik nog een game van dat gezegende jaar Command & Conquer: Red Alert. Jaja, de eerste, in 1997 had ik hem ook al, maar slechts de gekopieerde versie en die is dan es verloren geraakt. Toen ik hem deze week aan 2 euro in de Mediamarkt zag liggen brak mijn hart en nam ik heb mee en speel nu (toegegeven deels uit sentiment) iedere avond een nieuw level. Ik heb eigenlijk nooit de aanleg gehad om een gamer te zijn. In mijn eerste lic zat ik vaak soms uren met mijn maat achter zijne PC terwijl hij Diablo 2 speelde. Dat was best wel boeiend en ik gaf hem steeds tactische bijsturingen en opmerkingen, maar zelf spelen no way.

Het meeste van pc’s heb ik geleerd door te kijken. We gaan bijna 20 jaar terug in de tijd toen ik als 6-jarige vol verwondering stond te kijken naar die Commodore van mijn nonkel waar mijn neven Pacman, Ski or Die of Winter Games op speelden. Aaaah de tijd van de ‘echte’ 5,25″ floppy’s … Het moet 1994 geweest zijn toen ze hun Pentium kochten en we een stap verder zetten in de gamer-geschiedenis. Het eerste spel dat erop stond was Wolfenstein 3D, nog steeds één van mijn favorieten … fuck grafics, dit is gewoon een schitterend spel nah. Daarop volgde het iets mindere Blake Stone en nog van 3D Realms/Apogee verscheen ook Raptor. Dan kwam Prince of Persia, dat vond ik al iets moeilijker :p niets voor mij dus. En toen ging mijn wereld open: eerst met Dune 2 en dan met de eerste Command & Concquer (GDI en Brotherhood of NOD). Real time strategy bleek mijn ding te zijn en ik was dagen niet weg te slaan van mijn nonkel zijn pc, sommige dagen was ik er meer mee bezig dan mijn neven zelf. Dat waren ook de dagen wanneer ik mij amuseerde met het eerste en enige voetbalspel dat niet te moeilijk en te realistisch was voor mij: Fifa 94, het spel van de oneindige ommehaals en het 20 maal scoren door voor de keeper te staan. En toen brak de zon door de wolken en kocht ons vader een eigen pc. De eerste spellen die ik erop speelde waren Fury3x en het eindeloos boeiender Terminal Velocity. Het waren de jaren van schitterende games: 1996: Duke Nukem 3D (voor mij en een deel van mijn vrienden nog steeds een tijdloze first person shooter), Transport Tycoon, Civilization II (AoE kon hier gewoon nooit aan tippen) * 1997: C&C: Red Alert, Need for Speed 2 en Carmageddon * om in 1998 af te sluiten met Dune 2000 en nog een laatste stuiptrekking een beetje later met Starcraft. En ze mogen nu nog komen zeveren over hun Halo’s en Medal of Honor’s, mij kan het allemaal niet schelen … ik ben blijven steken in het midden van de jaren ’90, toen de games nog echte arcade waren en niet zo realistisch mogelijk wilden zijn. De games in de post vermeld zijn de enige die ik langer dan een uur heb gespeeld en die ik nog altijd hier en daar eens durf bovenhalen … noem het oudbolligheid, ik noem het nostalgie.

48.800 Reacties

  1. ??????? ???????? ??????? ? ????????????. ???? ???????? ???????, ???????? ???????????? ????????????, ???????? ??????????? ? ????????????? ???????????. ??????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ???????, ??????? ? ?????????? ???????. ??? ????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????????, ? ?????????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://1.narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/

  2. Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at birchbounty kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.

  3. ???? ? ????????? ?????? ?????? «??????? ?????» (??????, ??????????? ????????, ?????? ?????? ?????), ?? ?????????? ???????????? «????» ??????????? ? ?????? ??????. ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ????: ??????????? ????? ????????? ? ???????? ?????????, ? ???????? online-??????? ?? 15–20 ????? ???????????? ??????????????? ??? ?????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ???????? – http://vivod-iz-zapoya-voronezh15.ru

  4. Reading this triggered a small change in how I think about the topic going forward, and a stop at jacketjunction reinforced that subtle shift, the rare content that actually moves my thinking rather than just confirming or filling it is the kind I most value and this site is providing that kind of impact today.

  5. ?????????? ?? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????????? ?????. ????? ????? ???? ????????? ??? ?????????? ????????, ???????????? ????????, ????????? ???????????? ????? ???????????? ?????????, ????????? ????????????? ????? ??? ????????? ?????. ???? ???????? ???????????? ????????? ???, ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????????, ??????? ???? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ??????? ??????????? ? ????????????.
    ?????? ?????? – ???? ???????? ?? ??? ? ???????????

  6. ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ?????????? — ???? ?? ????? ????????????? ?????? ?? ???? ? ?????????????. ?? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ???????? ????????, ?? ? ??? ??????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ?????. ???????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????? ?????????? ?????????, ????????????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????? ??? ?????????????? ???????, ????????????????? ??????? ???????????? ? ??????? ??????????? ????????, ?????????? ??????????? ? ??????????????? ??????.
    ????????? ????? ?????? ??? – ??????????????? ??????? ???????? ????

  7. ???? ? ?? ?? «?????????? ?? ????» ?? ????????: ? ????? ?????????? ?????????????, ? ?????? — ?????????? ? ???????, ? ??????? — ?????????? ???????? ? ???????? ?? ??????. ???? — ????????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ???? ? ????? ?????????????; ????????????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ??????? ? ????????????? ???????????.
    ??????????? ?????? ????????? – ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????? ? ???????-??-????

  8. Reading this post made me realise I had been settling for lower quality elsewhere, and a look at gridgenius extended that recalibration, content that exposes how much I had been accepting in adjacent sources is content with calibrating effect on my standards and this site is performing that calibration function across topics for me reliably.

  9. Reading carefully here has reminded me what reading carefully feels like, and a look at blog66institution extended that reminder, the experience of careful reading versus skimming is different in ways I had partially forgotten and this site has clearly refreshed my memory of what attention feels like when content rewards it consistently.

  10. Vague feelings of recognition kept surfacing as I read because the writing names things I have been thinking, and a look at appreap produced more of those recognition moments, content that gives shape to private intuitions is content that makes me feel less alone in my own thinking and this site has that effect.

  11. ?????????? ????? ?? ????? — ??? ??????????? ??????????? ?????????, ? ?? «??????? ?????????? ?? ?????». ? ??????????????? ??????? «???????????» ?? ????????? ?? ?????? ????????: ?? ??????????? ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???????? ???????????? ? ???????? ??????????? ?????????. ??????? ???? — ????????? ??????????????? ?????????, ??????? ?????? ? ???????, ????????? ????????? ???? ? ??????? ????????????? ??? ??? ? ?????? ????. ?? ???????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????, ????? ???? ??????????? ??????? ? ?? ????????? ??????? «?????????????? ???????» ?????. ?????????????????? ???????? ? ?????? ???: ??????????? ?????? ????????????, ??????????????? ?????????, ??????????? ???????????? ? ????????? ? ??????????.
    ????????? ??? – http://vivod-iz-zapoya-voronezh15.ru/vyvod-iz-zapoya-za-den-voronezh/

  12. I learned more from this short post than from longer articles I read earlier today, and a stop at softreap added even more useful detail without going off topic, this site clearly knows how to keep things focused without sacrificing depth which is a hard balance to strike for any writer.

  13. ? ?????? ???? ????? ?? «??????» ???????? ??????????, ? ????????? ????????? ???? ? ?????? ? ?????? ????????, ????? ????, ????????????? ????????, ?????????????? ???? (??????????????????, ???????????????, ???????????????? ?????????) ? ?????????????. ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ???????? — ?????? ????? ?????????????? ?????? ?? ?????, ? ????????????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ????????.
    ???????? ?????? – ????? ?? ????? ? ?????????? ? ??????

  14. ??? ?????? ???????? ?? ???? ?????????: ?????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ? ?????????? «???????? ????????????». ??? ???????? — ??????? «????????????? ?????????» ? ?????????????. ?????? ????????? ? ????? ????? ??????????? ????: ?????????? ????????, ????????? ???????????, ???????? ?????????, ??????? ???????????? «?????» ? ??????? ??????????? ????????????? ???. ???????? ? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ???????????, ??????????? ????????, ?????, ????????? ? ???????????? ?? ?????? ?????.
    ???????? ?????? – ????? ?? ????? ???? ??????

  15. ??????? ? ??????? ???????? ?????????????. ????? ??????????? ????? ???? ??????? ????????? ????????, ????????????????? ??????????? ??? ????????????????, ??????? ???? ???????, ???????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ??????? ????????. ??????????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????????, ??????? ?????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????, ??????????? ???????????, ????????????? ???????????, ??????????? ??????????? ? ????????? ?????????. ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????????, ????????? ? ??????????????. ????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??????????????? ???????, ??????????????? ????????? ? ????????????.
    ?????? ?????? – ??????????????? ??????? ??????????

  16. ??????????????? ??????? «?????? ????????» — ??? ?????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ??????, ??? ???????????, ??????????? ???????, ???????????????? ? ????????? ????? ????????? ? ?????? «???????? ?????». ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?????????? ??????????? ????????????: ?????? ??? ????? ????, ????????? ?????? ? ??????? ???????????? «???? ??????». ????? ?????? ??????? ?????????????, ??????? ???? ????????????? ??????? ? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ????????????? — ??????? ?? «???????? ?????????», ? ?????, ??? ???? ??????????? ? ????? ?????? ???????????, ????? ??? ??????? ???? ????. ?????????????? ????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????? ????? ?????????????? ????????? — ?????? ????, ???????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ? ?????? ??????????? ? ??????? ??????????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ???????? – https://narkologicheskaya-klinika-v-rostove-na-donu16.ru/narkologiya-rostov-zapadnyj-rajon/

  17. The use of plain language without dumbing down the topic was really well done, and a look at toasttrek continued in that same accessible style, this is something many technical writers fail at because they either confuse their readers or condescend to them but here neither problem appears at all which is impressive really.

  18. Now considering writing a longer note about the post somewhere, and a look at techthimble added more material for that note, content that prompts me to write rather than just consume is content with generative energy and this site is producing that generative effect for me at a higher rate than most sources.

  19. Now appreciating the way the post avoided the temptation to be longer than necessary, and a look at captainscloset continued that lean approach, content with the discipline to stop when finished rather than padding for length is content that respects both itself and its readers and this site has that disciplined editorial culture clearly throughout.

  20. «??????????? ?????????? — ??? ?????????? ????????? ?????. ???? ?????? — ???? ???? — ???? ???? ??????. ?? ????????? ??, ??? ??? ???????, ????? ???? ????? ???????? ????. ????? ????? ????? ??? ??????, ??????? ??????, ? ????????? ?????????? ??????????», — ???????????? ????-???????? ??????? «?????? ????????» ?????? ?????????.
    ???????? ?????? – ??????? ? ??????????????? ???????

  21. A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at packagingparadise continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.

  22. ??????? ?????? ??????? “?????? ????” ??????? ?? ????????????????? ???????????? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ???????? ?????? ??????. ?????? ???? ???????? ????????? ???????? ? ????????????, ????????????????? ? ????????????, ????????? ???????? ???? ???????????? ?? ?????????? ???????????? ? ?????????, ????? ???????????? ? ????? ???????? ????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ?????? ???????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – http://??????-?????-??-?????.??

  23. Felt like the post had been edited rather than just drafted and published, and a stop at xobasket suggested the same care across the site, the difference between edited and unedited content is enormous for the reader and this site has clearly invested in the editing pass that most blogs skip entirely which really does show up.

  24. Found the rhythm of the prose particularly enjoyable on this read through, and a look at couriercorner kept that musical quality going across the related pages, sentence rhythm is something most blog writers ignore but it makes a real difference in how content lands with the careful reader who cares.

  25. ???????? ?????????? ?? ??????? ? ?????????. ???? ????????? ???????????? ????????????, ?????????? ????????, ????????????? ???????????? ? ?????????? ???? ???????. ? ??????? ??????? ???????? ?????? ????? ???? ????????????, ??????? ????? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – ???????? ?? ??? ???? ? ???????????

  26. Reading this gave me a quiet moment of intellectual pleasure that I had not been expecting, and a stop at aussiealley extended that pleasure across more pages, the unexpected reward of stumbling into careful writing is one of the small ongoing pleasures of reading the open web and this site is delivering it reliably.

  27. Pass this along to colleagues if the topic comes up, the framing here is sensible, and a stop at flarion adds more useful angles to share, the kind of content that improves conversations rather than just feeding them is what makes a resource genuinely valuable in professional contexts going forward over time and across project boundaries too.

  28. ?????? ??????? “?????? ????” — ?????????????? ????????????? ? ???????????? ?????, ??????????? ? ????? ???????????. ?? ???????????? ??????????? ??????, ?????????? ??????????? ???????, ??????????????? ?????? ? ?????????? ?????????. ???? ?????? — ?? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ???????????, ?? ? ???????????? ??????????????? ???????? ????????, ????? ?? ???? ????????? ? ??????????? ????? ? ????????.
    ????????? – http://??????-?????-??-?????.??

  29. ???? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ? ????????? ?????? ??????, ???????????? ????? ????????? ? ??????? ????????????. ??? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????? ??????? ?????????? ????????. ? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ????? ?? ?????????? ????????? ? ?? ???????? ????????? ????????? ??????????? ????????????? ??? ?????.
    ????????? – ????? ??????????????? ???????

  30. Found the writing surprisingly fresh for what is by now a well covered topic, and a stop at crawlclarity kept that freshness going across the related pages, original perspective on familiar ground is hard to come by and this site has clearly earned its place in the conversation rather than just rehashing old ideas.

  31. ???? ????? ???????????? ?? ????????? ???????? ? ?????????? ?? ???????????. ?? ?????? ???????????? ? ?????????????? ??????, ? ????? ?? ????????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????????. ???????? ?????? ??????? ??? ???? ????? ????????? ? ???????, ??????? ??????? ? ?? ?????? ? ?????????????.
    ?????????? ?? ??????????? – ??????????????? ????????? ??????

  32. Just want to record that this site is entering my regular reading list, and a look at wifiwharf confirmed it deserves the spot, my regular reading list is short and well curated and adding to it requires meeting a fairly high quality bar that this site has clearly cleared without much effort apparently.

  33. Now placing this in the same category as a few other sites I have come to trust, and a look at opencartopia continued the placement decision, the small category of fully trusted sites is one I extend rarely and only after multiple positive reading sessions and this site has earned the category placement methodically over time.

  34. ? ?????? ???? ????? ?? «??????» ???????? ??????????, ? ????????? ????????? ???? ? ?????? ? ?????? ????????, ????? ????, ????????????? ????????, ?????????????? ???? (??????????????????, ???????????????, ???????????????? ?????????) ? ?????????????. ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ???????? — ?????? ????? ?????????????? ?????? ?? ?????, ? ????????????? ??????????? ?? ???????? ????????.
    ????????? ??? – ??????? ????? ?? ?????

  35. Reading this prompted me to send the link to two different people for two different reasons, and a stop at coralcart provided ammunition for a third share, content that suits multiple audiences without being generic enough to be useless to any of them is genuinely valuable and this site has that multi audience quality clearly.

  36. ???????? ???? «?????????» — ????????? ????????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????? ?????????. ??????? ?????????????? ????? ?????????, ????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ??????????????? ? ???????????????, ? ????????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ?? ????????? ????? ??????? ???????. ??? ???? ?????? ??? ??????????? ??????? ??????: ??? ??????, ????? ??? ????? ? ??? ????? ????????? ????????? ????? 30, 60 ? 120 ?????. ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???????? ???? — ???????? «??????? ?????» ? ???????? ??????-?????? ? ?????? ???? ??????????, ???? ??????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ? ?????? ????.
    ????????? ????? ?????? ??? – ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ??????-??-????

  37. ???? ????? ???????? ?????????? ? ????????? ??????????? ? ??????? ????????. ?? ???????? ????????????? ??????????, ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????? ? ???????????, ? ????? ?? ??????? ?? ????????????? ???????? ??????????? ??????.
    ??????????? ?????? ????????? – ??????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????

  38. ??????????? ??????? ????? ?? ???????? ? ????? ??????????. ???? ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ??????, ???????? ???????, ??? ????????????? ??????????? ?????????????? ????????????, ????? ???? ????????? ?????????????? ????? ????????????. ?????? ??????????? ?????? — ?????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ????????????, ?????????? ??????? ????????? ? ??????? ???????, ??? ??????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ? ???????????? ??????? ???????????. ???????????, ????????????, ??????????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ??????????????? ??? ????????? ?????, ????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????????? ?????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – vyvod-iz-zapoya

  39. Reading this felt easy in the best way, no friction and no confusion at any point, and a stop at vaultvalue carried that same comfort across more pages, the kind of editorial flow that lets you absorb information without fighting the format which is increasingly hard to find on the open web today across topics.

  40. Solid value packed into a relatively short post, that takes skill, and a look at lotusloft continues the dense useful content across more pages, this site clearly understands that respecting reader time is itself a form of generosity which is something most blog operations seem to have forgotten lately across the wider open web.

  41. Halfway through I knew I would finish the post, and a stop at softregal also held me through to the end, content that signals its quality early and then sustains it is content with real internal consistency and this site has clearly figured out how to maintain quality from opening sentence through to closing thought.

  42. ???????????? ????? — ??? ?? ?????? «??????? ????????», ? ?????????, ??? ??????? ???????? ????????-?????????? ???????, ??????, ??????? ????????? ? ????? ????????????. ? ??????????????? ??????? «????????» (??????-??-????) ?????????? ????? ?? ????? ??????????? ??? ??????????? ??????? ??????: ????????? 24/7 — ???????? ???? — ????????? ??????? — ??????????? ?????????? ? ???????????????????? ?????????. ?? ????????? ?? ??? ? ??????????? ??????, ??? ??????????????? ??????, ???????? ????????-???????????, ????????? ????????????? ??????????? ?????????? ? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ????????? 72 ????. ????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ??????????????? ?????????, ?? ??????? ??????????? ? ????????? ????? ?????.
    ???????? ?????????????? ???????? – ????????? ????? ?? ????? ??????-??-????

  43. ??? ????????????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ??????? ??????????? ????????? ???? ???????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????????. ?????? ??? ?????????? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ? ???????. ???????????? ??????? ????? ?????????????? ?????????? ???, ?????? ????????, ??????? ????????, ?????????? ? ??????????? ????????. ???? ??????? ???????? ???? ????????????? ?? ???????? ???????????, ???? ????????? ???????? ???????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu

Laat een reactie achter

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Deze site gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie gegevens worden verwerkt.