De game-jaren

Retro is in zeggen ze … wel ik denk dat ik op het vlak van games gewoon in het verleden ben blijven steken. Ergens rond de eerste jaren dat ik een pc had, 1997 moet dat ongeveer zijn. Deze week kocht ik nog een game van dat gezegende jaar Command & Conquer: Red Alert. Jaja, de eerste, in 1997 had ik hem ook al, maar slechts de gekopieerde versie en die is dan es verloren geraakt. Toen ik hem deze week aan 2 euro in de Mediamarkt zag liggen brak mijn hart en nam ik heb mee en speel nu (toegegeven deels uit sentiment) iedere avond een nieuw level. Ik heb eigenlijk nooit de aanleg gehad om een gamer te zijn. In mijn eerste lic zat ik vaak soms uren met mijn maat achter zijne PC terwijl hij Diablo 2 speelde. Dat was best wel boeiend en ik gaf hem steeds tactische bijsturingen en opmerkingen, maar zelf spelen no way.

Het meeste van pc’s heb ik geleerd door te kijken. We gaan bijna 20 jaar terug in de tijd toen ik als 6-jarige vol verwondering stond te kijken naar die Commodore van mijn nonkel waar mijn neven Pacman, Ski or Die of Winter Games op speelden. Aaaah de tijd van de ‘echte’ 5,25″ floppy’s … Het moet 1994 geweest zijn toen ze hun Pentium kochten en we een stap verder zetten in de gamer-geschiedenis. Het eerste spel dat erop stond was Wolfenstein 3D, nog steeds één van mijn favorieten … fuck grafics, dit is gewoon een schitterend spel nah. Daarop volgde het iets mindere Blake Stone en nog van 3D Realms/Apogee verscheen ook Raptor. Dan kwam Prince of Persia, dat vond ik al iets moeilijker :p niets voor mij dus. En toen ging mijn wereld open: eerst met Dune 2 en dan met de eerste Command & Concquer (GDI en Brotherhood of NOD). Real time strategy bleek mijn ding te zijn en ik was dagen niet weg te slaan van mijn nonkel zijn pc, sommige dagen was ik er meer mee bezig dan mijn neven zelf. Dat waren ook de dagen wanneer ik mij amuseerde met het eerste en enige voetbalspel dat niet te moeilijk en te realistisch was voor mij: Fifa 94, het spel van de oneindige ommehaals en het 20 maal scoren door voor de keeper te staan. En toen brak de zon door de wolken en kocht ons vader een eigen pc. De eerste spellen die ik erop speelde waren Fury3x en het eindeloos boeiender Terminal Velocity. Het waren de jaren van schitterende games: 1996: Duke Nukem 3D (voor mij en een deel van mijn vrienden nog steeds een tijdloze first person shooter), Transport Tycoon, Civilization II (AoE kon hier gewoon nooit aan tippen) * 1997: C&C: Red Alert, Need for Speed 2 en Carmageddon * om in 1998 af te sluiten met Dune 2000 en nog een laatste stuiptrekking een beetje later met Starcraft. En ze mogen nu nog komen zeveren over hun Halo’s en Medal of Honor’s, mij kan het allemaal niet schelen … ik ben blijven steken in het midden van de jaren ’90, toen de games nog echte arcade waren en niet zo realistisch mogelijk wilden zijn. De games in de post vermeld zijn de enige die ik langer dan een uur heb gespeeld en die ik nog altijd hier en daar eens durf bovenhalen … noem het oudbolligheid, ik noem het nostalgie.

50.101 Reacties

  1. Comfortable read, finished it without realising how much time had passed, and a look at gardengalleon pulled me into more pages the same way, the absence of friction in good content lets time disappear and that is one of the highest compliments I can pay any piece of writing I find online during a regular search session.

  2. A piece that did exactly what it promised in the headline without overshooting or underdelivering, and a look at supplementstack continued that calibration, alignment between promise and delivery is a basic editorial virtue that many sites fail at and this site has clearly mastered the matching of expectation and substance throughout pieces.

  3. ????? ??? ??? ?????? ???????, ???? ????????? ?????? ???????? ? ????????, ??????? ???????? ????????????. ????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ????????, ???????????? ?????, ??????? ????????, ??????????? ???????, ??????????? ????????? ? ??????? ????????. ??? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ????????????? ??????? ? ??????????.
    ?????????????? ?????????? – ????? ?? ????? ?????????? ?? ???? ? ?????-??????????

  4. ??????????? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ??????????? ??????????. ? ??????? ????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ???????????, ?????? ? ??????????? ???????????? ? ??????????????? ?????????. ? ??????? ??????? ???? ???????????, ????????? ? ????????????????. ????????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ????????????????? ??????, ?????? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ??????????????? ????????? ? ????????? ????????? ? ?????????. ????? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ????????, ? ??? ??????? ????????????? ? ????????????? ????????? ? ?????? ????? ???????????? ????????, ???????? ??? ?????????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – ??????????? ?? ??????????? ? ?????? ?? ????

  5. Appreciate that you did not pad this with fluff to hit a word count, the post says what it needs to say and stops, and a look at radiantnet did the same, brevity here feels intentional not lazy which is a distinction many writers miss completely sometimes when they are working under deadlines.

  6. Most attempts at writing on this topic feel like they are missing something and this post finally identified what was missing, and a look at goldenget extended that diagnostic clarity, content that names what is wrong with adjacent treatments while doing better itself is content with both critical and constructive value and this site has both.

  7. Reading this site over the past week has changed how I evaluate content in this space, and a look at astrevio extended that recalibration, the standards I bring to reading on the topic have shifted upward as a direct result of regular exposure to this kind of work and that shift will outlast any single reading session.

  8. ????? ??? ??? ?????? ???????, ???? ????????? ?????? ???????? ? ????????, ??????? ???????? ????????????. ????? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ????????, ???????????? ?????, ??????? ????????, ??????????? ???????, ??????????? ????????? ? ??????? ????????. ??? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ????????????? ??????? ? ??????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://a.vivod-iz-zapoya-v-sankt-peterburge16.ru/

  9. Generally my attention drifts on long posts but this one held it through the end, and a stop at blog66at earned the same sustained focus, content that defeats my drift tendency is content with substantive pulling power and this site has demonstrated that pulling power across multiple pieces in a session that has now run quite long actually.

  10. ??????? ????????? ?? ???? ?????, ???? ????????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??? ??????????. ??????? ???????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???? ????????? ???????? ? ????????? ????? ???????. ????? ?????? ??????, ????? ??????? ???????? ?? ??????, ?? ???? ?? ????? ????? ? ???????. ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????????? ???????? ? ? ??????????? ??????????????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????????????

  11. ????? ?? ????? ???????????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????????? ???? ? ?????????. ???????????? ???????? ????????? ??????????? ????????????, ?? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????????. ??????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ? ????????? ??????? ???????????, ????????????, ???????????, ???????????? ? ???????????? ?????. ??????????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??? ?????, ??????? ????? ??? ???????? ????????????, ???????????? ? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ? ??? ?? ??? ???????? ?????????? ??????????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ? ????????

  12. Bookmark added with a small note about why, and a look at blog44him prompted another bookmark with another note, the bookmarks I annotate are the ones I expect to return to deliberately rather than stumble into and this site is generating annotated bookmarks at a higher rate than my usual content sources by some margin.

  13. Considered against the flood of similar content this one stands apart in important ways, and a stop at traceroot extended that distinctive feel, sites that find their own corner of a crowded topic and stay there are sites worth following and this one has clearly carved out its own space and committed to defending it carefully.

  14. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at benjaminross continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  15. ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????????, ?? ??????? ??????????? ?? ???? ?? ?????????????. ???? ????? ???????????, ?????????? ???????? ? ?????, ???????????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????. ??????????? ????????? ????? ???????? ??????? ???????????, ???????????, ????????????, ?????????? ????????? ? ????????????. ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????????????.
    ????????? – ???????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??????????

  16. A piece that reads like it was written for me without claiming to be written for me, and a look at cypresschic produced the same fit, when the writer audience match clicks naturally without being engineered through demographic targeting you know the writing is solid and this site has that natural fit consistently for me.

  17. ????? ?? ????? – ??? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????, ?????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????, ?? ???????? ??? ?? ?????? ????????? ?? ??? ????? ????????? ???????????. ??????? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????????, ? ????????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????. ???????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ???????????? ????? ? ??????, ???????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????.
    ?????? ?????? – ???? ????? ?? ????? ? ?????-??????????

  18. Honest take is that I will probably forget most of what I read online today but this post is one I will remember, and a stop at quadquesty kept that same memorable quality going, certain writing leaves a residue in the mind in a way most content simply does not manage.

  19. Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at christmascraft kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.

  20. ? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ? ?????????????, ??????? ??????????? ?????? ? ???????? ??????? ??????. ???????? ??????, ????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ? ??? ?????? ???? ? ?????????????.
    ???????, ????? ?????? ?????? – ???????? ?????

  21. ???????? ?????????? ?? ???? ????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ? ????????? ?????????? ??? ???????????????? ????????? ?????????. ???? ????????? ?? ?????????? ??????, ???????? ???????????, ???????? ??????? ????????????? ????????, ?????, ????????? ????????? ????, ????????, ??????? ????????????? ? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????? ??????? ???????. ??? ?????????? ???????????????? ??????????? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ? ??????????, ???????????? ?? ???????? ?????, ?????????????? ?????-?????????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ?????????? ????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – ???????? ?????????? ?? ????? ?? ????

  22. ??????????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????, ?????? ???????? ? ?????, ????????? ??? ? ????????? ?????? ????????????. ??????? ????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ????, ???????, ?????, ??????, ????????????, ??????, ???????, ?????????????????, ?????????? ? ??????? ?????? ????????. ? ????? ???????? ??????? ?????????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????????, ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ????????? ???? ??? ? ???????? ??????? ????????????? ??????????? ??????, ??????, ????? ? ??????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://4.kapelnica-ot-zapoya-moskva0.ru/

  23. Even on a quick first read the substance of the post comes through, and a look at blog66investment reinforced that immediate quality, content that does not require a slow careful read to demonstrate value but rewards one anyway is content with real depth and this site has produced work of that demanding depth class.

  24. ????? ?? ????? ? ??????? ? ??????????????? ??????? «??????» — ??????????? ?????? ????????, ??????? ?? ????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????? ??? ?????? ????????? ????????. ??????? ??????????? ????????????? ? ?????? ????????, ?????????? ????????, ???????????? ?????, ??????????? ??????????? ? ???????? ????????????. ????-???????? ???????? ??????, ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ????? ? ???????????? ????????, ???????? ??????? ? ?????? ????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ??????: ????? ?? ????? ?? ????, ???????????? ??????? ??? ?????????????? ? ?????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – ?????? ????? ?? ?????

  25. ??????????? ?????? ??? ????????? ? ????????? ? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????????? ???????, ??????????????? ?????????, ???????????? ? ????????????????? ????. ??????? ??????????? ?? ?????????????? ????? ??????????? ??? ??????? ??????? ???????????. ??? ??????????? ?????????? ????? ???????? ????????????, ?????? ??? ????????? ? ?????????, ????????? ??? ? ?????????????? ?????????, ??????????? ??? ???????????? ????????, ? ????? ?????????? ??????? ? ????????????????? ???????. ??????????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ? ?????? ????? ???????????, ???????????? ???????? ? ??????????? ????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – https://3.narkologicheskaya-klinika-moskva11.ru/

  26. ? ???? ?????????? ?? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ???????????. ???????? ?????? ? ????? ????????????, ???????? ? ?????????????, ??????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???????. ?? ???????? ?? ??, ????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????, ??????? ????? ?????? ? ?????? ? ????????.
    ?????? ?????! – ????????? ?? ????? ????????????? ???????

  27. ??????????? ?? ??????????? ? ?????? ? ?????? «??? ????» ?????????? ??? ????? ???????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????. ??????????????? ?????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ???? ? ?????????, ???????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ????????? ? ???????? ???????, ??? ??????? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ? ????????? ?????? ?????. ????? ?????????? ???? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ???????????, ???????????? ???????????? ????????, ??????? ???????????? ???????????, ??????????? ??????????? ? ????????????????. ????? ?????????????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????????? ? ?????? ????????, ????????, ????? ??????????? ??????? ? ????????? ?????????????.
    ????????? – ??????????? ?? ??????????? ?? ???? ? ??????

  28. ??????????????? ????? ???????? ?????????????, ????????? ?????? ??????, ??????, ??????? ???????, ????? ? ????????????? ??????. ???????? ?????? ????????? ? ???????????? ???????? ? ???????, ???????, ??????????, ????, ?????? ? ????? ????????????. ??? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???????? ??? ????? ??????. ??????????????? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ?????????, ? ??????? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ???? ???? ? ?????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ?? ??????????? ?????????.
    ????????? – ???? ????? ?? ????? ??????????

  29. ?????????????? ??????? ???????? ????????. ? ????????? ????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????, ????????????, ??????? ????????????? ????????, ??????????????? ???????, ???????????, ????????????, ??????? ????????? ? ????????????? ?????????, ?????????????? ? ????????? ?????????. ??? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ??????????? ??? ????????, ? ??? ??????? ??????????? — ??????????? ??????????? ???????????, ??????? ????????????, ?????? ? ????????????? ??????? ????????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – https://3.narkologicheskaya-klinika-moskva11.ru/

  30. A piece that was confident enough to leave some questions open rather than forcing closure, and a look at datasavanna continued that intellectual honesty, content that admits the limits of its scope is more trustworthy than content that pretends to total understanding and this site has the right calibration on certainty consistently.

  31. ??????? «??? ????» ???????? ?????????????. ???????????? ????????? ???????? ????????, ? ??????????? ???????? ????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ? ??????? ????????? ???????????? ??????. ???? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ?????, ???????? ???????????? ??? ??????????? ? ?????????, ??????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?????: ????????????, ???????????, ??????????????? ???????, ???????????, ???????????? ? ??? ????????????? ????????????. ?????? ??????????? ??????? ??????????? ???????? ?????????????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????? ????????, ?? ? ?? ??????????????? ??????? ???????????.
    ???????? ?????? ?????????? – ??????????? ?? ??????????? ????

  32. ????? ?? ????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ??????. ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????????????? ???????????? ?????????, ????? ?????????? ?????? ????????, ????? ????????, ???????? ? ??????????? ????????????, ????????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ?????????. ????? ?????? ????????? ????????? ????????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?? ???????????? ?????????, ????????????????? ??????????? ????????.
    ?????? ?????? – ?????????? ?? ????? ???????? ?? ????

  33. ????? ?? ????? ? ??????????? — ???????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ????????, ?????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????. ???????????? ??????????? ????? ?????????? ????? ????????? ?? ????, ????????????, ???????????? ???????, ???????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ???????????. ??????? ??????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????, ???? ???????????, ?????????? ????????, ???????, ??????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????????????. ????? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????, ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ? ??????????, ???????? ?????.
    ??????? ?????? ????????? – ??????? ????? ?? ????? ? ???????????

  34. Really grateful for content like this, it does not waste my time and it does not insult my intelligence either, and a quick look at quoralia was the same, balanced respectful writing that makes a person feel welcome rather than rushed through pages of forced engagement just to keep clicking around.

  35. ????? ?? ????? ? ??????????? — ???????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ????????, ?????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????. ???????????? ??????????? ????? ?????????? ????? ????????? ?? ????, ????????????, ???????????? ???????, ???????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ???????????. ??????? ??????????? ????????? ???????????? ????????, ???? ???????????, ?????????? ????????, ???????, ??????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????????????. ????? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ?????????, ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ? ??????????, ???????? ?????.
    ?????? ?????? – https://s.vyvod-iz-zapoya-v-krasnoyarske17.ru/

  36. ????? ?? ????? – ??? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????, ?????? ???????? ? ???????? ?????????, ?? ???????? ??? ?? ?????? ????????? ?? ??? ????? ????????? ???????????. ??????? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????????, ? ????????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????????. ???????? ????????? ????????, ???????? ???????????? ????? ? ??????, ???????? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ????????? ???????????? ???????.
    ????????? – ????? ?? ????? ? ???????

  37. Just want to recognise that someone clearly cared about how this turned out, and a look at truvora confirmed that care extends across the broader site, you can feel the difference between content shipped to hit a deadline and content released because the writer was actually proud of the result for once.

Laat een reactie achter

Je e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *

Deze site gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie gegevens worden verwerkt.